Comments on: The Portability of Content: Implications on Usage, SEO and Tracking https://www.bryaneisenberg.com/the-portability-of-content-implications-on-usage-seo-and-tracking/ Professional Speakers, Best Selling Authors, Online Marketing Pioneers Thu, 03 Oct 2024 18:49:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Jen https://www.bryaneisenberg.com/the-portability-of-content-implications-on-usage-seo-and-tracking/#comment-145 Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:30:50 +0000 http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/?p=278#comment-145 My initial thought was simply around the multi-attribution idea. I mean, in theory, a link posted in one place could travel organically all over – that's nothing new. The person who saw it on Facebook grabs the link and posts it on their blog (campaign tags and all), and the attribution story is not much different from other types of first click/last click, etc.

But what is getting my brain going now is the spam issue. Because Google (in particular) is quite focused on "rewarding" quality content with high ranks. How do you programmatically identify the quality of a tweet? Would the tweeter's influence come into play? The number of times they've been blocked? (is that accessible?) The number of unique users who retweeted?

The best thing about working in this field is how there's always something new to noodle over 🙂

]]> By: Raven Matt https://www.bryaneisenberg.com/the-portability-of-content-implications-on-usage-seo-and-tracking/#comment-140 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:41:09 +0000 http://www.bryaneisenberg.com/?p=278#comment-140 Our free url shortener kl.am allows you to add a custom url, campaign sorurce, medium, name parameters, and tags all within one interface for easy shortened url tracking. Basic statistics and a toolbar bookmarklet are also provided.

]]>